![]() ![]() ![]() More time if one does not capture the defect on the first or even second attempts. It also demands great computer processing power and time. The drawback is that 3D is slower, requires programming and typically demands virtual slicing of the object through software, followed by reconstruction in another set of viewing software, often on a dedicated workstation. ![]() Many pernicious solder joint defects elude 2D X-ray inspection. If you can find your problem in 2D in mere minutes, you often are well on your way to solving serious process issues. 2D is faster and, therefore, the first tool usually used in X-ray failure analysis. We use both 2D and 3D imagery to find assembly defects. A typical 3D CT-scan image looks like this: Typical 2D images look like this:ģD is shorthand for X-ray or CT-scan images that capture the full visual range of an object of interest, usually expressed in three-dimensional coordinate terms of X, Y and Z. It usually comes from a salesperson, although interestingly, not always.Īs the rest of us know, 2D describes those X-ray images taken in two dimensions, usually demarcated in Cartesian coordinate terms of X and Y, and displayed on a flat panel or a flat image viewer. “Can you explain to me the differences between 2D X-ray, 3D X-ray and 5D X-ray?” On closer inspection, some equipment isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Home » Posts » Articles » Wishful Thinking in Five Dimensions Wishful Thinking in Five Dimensions ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |